Maximum Throughput Comparison of FHIR Servers by Platform

FHIR in the Cloud: AWS vs Azure vs Google Cloud – The Battle of Platforms

Hosted Aidbox: A Cloud-Native Leader

Aidbox provides managed FHIR hosting across AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud without vendor lock-in. Its containerized architecture allows instant scaling and global deployments. In contrast, Smile, Kodjin, and HAPI usually tie installations more tightly to a single cloud environment or require additional setup for multi-cloud.

Feature Analysis: Major Cloud Offerings

While Azure FHIR, AWS HealthLake, and Google Cloud Healthcare API all offer good base features, they focus on their respective ecosystems. Aidbox overlays consistent multi-cloud tooling, enabling healthcare organizations to move seamlessly between providers or operate in hybrid modes.
Maximum Throughput Comparison of FHIR Servers by Platform

Migration Cases and Cost Breakdown

Case studies show hospitals switching from Azure-hosted FHIR to Aidbox for better interoperability with their analytics stack spread across clouds. Smile and HAPI migrations often involve more re-coding, while Kodjin’s smaller ecosystem limits flexibility.